EFL Students' Perceptions of E-learning Tools’ Effects on Students’ Engagement in English Speaking Skill Online Classes
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54855/acoj.241513Keywords:
e-learning tools, online classes, speaking skills, student engagementAbstract
This paper aims to explore Vietnamese students' perceptions of the effects of e-learning tools on student engagement in English-speaking skills online classes. With a survey design and a mixed-method approach, the study investigated 100 participants, including sophomores and juniors, at the Faculty of English Linguistics and Literature, the University of Social Sciences and Humanities, Vietnam National University of Ho Chi Minh City. Descriptive statistics and qualitative data gleaned from a questionnaire and 10 semi-structured interviews were analyzed using SPSS and thematic analysis. Findings show e-learning tools enhance student engagement by facilitating speaking discussion, evoking comfort, and contributing to students’ investment in the tasks. On the contrary, e-learning tools hinder student engagement by causing boredom, stress, and distraction. The study results suggest pedagogical implications for teachers in the design of more engaging English-speaking online lessons. Further, faculty and school leaders can consider the research findings when revising and updating their curriculum to meet the increasing demands of online learning and teaching, with learners' engagement as the centrality. Future research can delve more into inferential statistics on the effects of online classes on students' engagement in English speaking, listening, reading, or writing skills.References
Al Hosni, S. (2014). Speaking difficulties encountered by young EFL learners. International Journal on Studies in English Language and Literature (IJSELL), 2(6), 22-30. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/270340628_Speaking_Difficulties_Encountered_by_Young_EFL_Learners
Abrami, P. C., Bernard, R. M., Bures, E. M., Borokhovski, E., & Tamim, R. M. (2011). Interaction in distance education and online learning: Using evidence and theory to improve practice. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 23(2-3), 82–103. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-011-9043-x
Banna, J., Lin, M. F. G., Stewart, M., & Fialkowski, M. K. (2015). Interaction matters: Strategies to promote engaged learning in an online introductory nutrition course. Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 11(2), 249 - 261. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4948751/
Bomia, L., Beluzo, L., Demeester, D., Elander, K., Johnson, M., & Sheldon, B. (1997). The impact of teaching strategies on intrinsic motivation. Institute of Education Sciences. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED418925&fbclid=IwAR0cM_NX96kued-DkHvHfvyyw9F0fFbFsGTgPrhpoDifx-Tzt246vfXfXc4
Border, J., Stoudt, K., & Warnock, M. (2006). E-Learning Tools. E-Learning Concepts and Techniques [eBook edition]. Institute for Interactive Technologies. https://engineering.futureuniversity.com/BOOKS%20FOR%20IT/E%20learning%20%20(2).pdf
Bộ giáo dục và Đào tạo. (2013). Chương trình hành động, Chiến lược phát triển giáo dục Việt Nam 2011-2020, Kết luận số 51-KL/TW ngày 29/10/2012 của Hội nghị lần thứ 6 Ban Chấp hành Trung ương Đảng khóa XI và Chỉ thị số 02/CT-TTg ngày 22/01/2013 của Thủ Tướng Chính phủ về đổi mới căn bản, toàn diện giáo dục và đào tạo (Ban hành kèm theo Quyết định số 1215/QĐ-BGDĐT ngày 04 tháng 4 năm 2013 của Bộ trưởng Bộ Giáo dục và Đào tạo). https://thuvienphapluat.vn/van-ban/Giao-duc/Quyet-dinh-1215-QD-BGDDT-Chuong-trinh-hanh-dong-cua-nganh-Giao-duc-180866.aspx
(Ministry of Education and Training (2013). Decision No. 1215/QĐ-BGDĐT dated 04/04/2013 Issuance of Action plan of Education Sector to implement Viet Nam’s education development strategy from 2011-2020. https://thuvienphapluat.vn/van-ban/Giao-duc/Quyet-dinh-1215-QD-BGDDT-Chuong-trinh-hanh-dong-cua-nganh-Giao-duc-180866.aspx)
Bryson, C., & Hand, L. (2007). The role of engagement in inspiring teaching and learning. Innovations in education and teaching international, 44(4), 349-362. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703290701602748
Caulfield, J. (2019, September 6). How to Do Thematic Analysis: A Step-by-Step Guide & Examples. https://www.scribbr.com/methodology/thematic-analysis/
Cheung, A. (2021). Synchronous online teaching, a blessing or a curse? Insights from EFL primary students’ interaction during online English lessons. System, 100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2021.102566
Chhabra, P. (2012). Use of E-Learning tools in teaching English. International Journal of Computing & Business Research. http://researchmanuscripts.com/isociety2012/9.pdf
Chugh, R. (2010). E-learning tools and their impact on pedagogy. In D.S. Ubha & J. Kaur (Eds.), Emerging Paradigms in Commerce and Management Education (pp. 58-81). GSSDGS Khalsa College Press. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/275771731_E-learning_tools_and_their_impact_on_pedagogy
Dao, T. T. (2018). Ứng dụng công nghệ thông tin nhằm tăng hứng thú trong giờ học tiếng Anh. Kỷ yếu của hội thảo quốc tế giáo dục cho mọi người. https://repository.vnu.edu.vn/handle/VNU_123/95064
(Dao, T. T. (2018). Applying information technology to enhance teaching English. Proceedings of International Conference Education For All. https://repository.vnu.edu.vn/handle/VNU_123/95064)
Dhand, N. (June 11, 2015). Descriptive Analysis: Take it easy!. https://www.statulator.com/blog/descriptive-analysis-take-it-easy/
Fink, A. (2003). How to ask survey questions (Vol. 1). SAGE Publications.
Gunuc, S. (2014). The relationships between student engagement and their academic achievement. International Journal on New Trends in Education and Their Implications, 5(4), Article 19. http://www.ijonte.org/FileUpload/ks63207/File/19.gunuc.pdf
Gunuc, S., & Kuzu, A. (2014). Student engagement scale: Development, reliability and validity. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 40. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2014.938019
Halimatusyadiyah, N. (2022). Engaging students speaking skill using Google Meet platform: Students perception. Journal of English Education Program (JEEP), 9(1), 75-84. http://doi.org/10.25157/(jeep).v9i1.7576
Hamouda, A. (2020). The effect of virtual classes on Saudi EFL students’ speaking skills. International Journal of Linguistics, Literature and Translation, 3(4), 175–204. https://doi.org/10.32996/ijllt.2020.3.4.18
Heggart, K. R. & Yoo, J. (2018). Getting the most from Google Classroom: A pedagogical framework for tertiary educators. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 43(3), 139-153. https://doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2018v43n3.9
Hoang, T. T. D., & Tran, Q. H. (2022). Changes in students' experiences and perceptions towards e-learning at Hoa Sen University during Covid-19 pandemic. AsiaCALL Online Journal, 13(1), 22-39. http://eoi.citefactor.org/10.11251/acoj.13.01.002
Huang, M. (2021). A case study of ESL students’ remote speaking class learning experiences in a Canadian university during the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of English Language Teaching and Applied Linguistics, 3(5). https://doi.org/10.32996/jeltal.2021.3.5.4
Hussein, E. T. (2016). The effectiveness of using Blackboard in improving the English listening and speaking skills of the female students at the University of Hail. Advances in Social Sciences Research Journal, 3(12). https://doi.org/10.14738/assrj.312.2379
Joyce, K. M., & Brown, A. (2009). Enhancing social presence in online learning: Mediation strategies applied to social networking tools. Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, 12(4). https://www.learntechlib.org/p/76600/
Kigundu, S. (2014). Engaging e-Learning in higher education: Issues and challenges. International Journal of Educational Sciences, 6(1), 125 - 132. https://doi.org/10.1080/09751122.2014.11890125
Lamborn, S., Newmann, F., & Wehlage, G. (1992). The significance and sources of student engagement. Student engagement and achievement in American secondary schools, 11-39. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED371047.pdf#page=16
Marinoni, G., Van’t Land, H., & Jensen, T. (2020). The impact of COVID-19 on higher education around the world. IAU Global Survey Report, (102). https://www.iau-aiu.net/IMG/pdf/iau_covid19_and_he_survey_report_final_may_2020.pdf
Martin, F., & Bolliger, D. U. (2018). Engagement matters: Student perceptions on the importance of engagement strategies in the online learning environment. Online Learning, 22(1), 205 - 222. http://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v22i1.1092
Moore, M. G. (1989). Three types of interaction. The American Journal of Distance Education, 3(2), 1-7. https://doi.org/10.1080/08923648909526659
Ngo, C. L. (2018). Web-based language learning (WBLL) for enhancing L2 speaking performance: A review. Advances in Language and Literary Studies, 9(4), 143-152. https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.alls.v.9n.4p.143
Ngo, D. H. (2021). Perceptions of EFL tertiary students towards the correlation between e-learning and learning engagement during the COVID-19 pandemic. International Journal of TESOL & Education, 1(3), 235–259. http://i-jte.org/index.php/journal/article/view/99
Nguyen, T. T. H. (2021). Implementing digital techniques to stimulate EFL students’ engagement: A case study in Vietnam. International Journal of TESOL & Education, 1(3), 105–129. Retrieved from http://eoi.citefactor.org/10.11250/ijte.01.03.007
Nguyen, V. L. (2016). Ứng dụng công nghệ thông tin trong dạy học ngoại ngữ: Từ kinh nghiệm quốc tế đến thực tại Việt Nam. Tạp chí Khoa học ĐHQGHN: Nghiên cứu Giáo dục, 32(2). https://js.vnu.edu.vn/ER/article/view/1670
(Nguyen, V. L. (2016). IT application in foreign language education: From international experience to realities in Vietnam. VNU Journal of Science: Education Research, 32(2). https://js.vnu.edu.vn/ER/article/view/1670)
Nguyen, X. T., & Le, X. T. (2013). The design and development of English writing courses based on the Moodle e-learning platform: their effectiveness. AsiaCALL Online Journal, 7(1). https://asiacall.info/acoj/index.php/journal/article/view/135/63?fbclid=IwAR3Lsmpa-_ZXoZ3tPMncr-g-Bt_BHtfCaiesVt4OE6YWWTZI4FGndwvYjhM
Nik Fauzi, S. F., Ambi, S., Fhaeizdhyall, A. & Unin, N. (2022). Students’ perceptions of online learning experiences for ESL speaking activities. Journal of Cognitive Sciences and Human Development, 8(1), 186-201. http://doi.org/10.33736/jcshd.4520.2022
Pham, D. T. (2019). Ứng dụng các công cụ của Google và Microsoft vào giảng dạy tiếng Anh. Tạp chí Khoa học Yersin - Chuyên đề Khoa học & Công nghệ, 7, 79-89. https://admin.yersin.edu.vn/Uploads/files/N%C4%83m%202019%20-%20T%E1%BA%A1p%20ch%C3%AD%20khoa%20h%E1%BB%8Dc/9_%20Pham%20Duc%20Thuan.pdf
(Pham, D. T. (2019). Integration of Google and Microsoft products into teaching English. Journal of Yersin Science - Natural Sciences and Technology, 7, 79-89. https://admin.yersin.edu.vn/Uploads/files/N%C4%83m%202019%20-%20T%E1%BA%A1p%20ch%C3%AD%20khoa%20h%E1%BB%8Dc/9_%20Pham%20Duc%20Thuan.pdf)
Regueras, L. M., Verdu, E., Munoz, M. F., Perez, M. A., Castro, J. P. de, & Verdu, M. J. (2009). Effects of competitive e-learning tools on higher education students: a case study. IEEE Transactions on Education, 52(2), 279-285. http://doi.org/10.1109/TE.2008.928198
Revere, L., & Kovach, J. V. (2011). Online technologies for engaged learning: A meaningful synthesis for educators. The Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 12(2), 113–124. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/296456436_Online_technologies_for_engaged_learning_A_meaningful_synthesis_for_educators
Robinson, C. C., & Hullinger, H. (2008). New benchmarks in higher education: Student engagement in online learning. Journal of Education for Business, 84(2), 101–108. https://doi.org/10.3200/JOEB.84.2.101-109
Shukri, A., Nordin, L., Salleh, F. I. M., Raidzwan, S. N. M., & Ahmad, R. (2020). UniKL students' perception of synchronous learning using Information and Communications Technology (ICT) as learning tools to learn English. Journal of Critical Reviews, 7(8). https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/d94f/cdd0fbfa007855602fb4e30c5b9eaf25e67c.pdf?_ga=2.43525989.1724324156.1650212725-1575668929.1650212725
Son, J. B. (2011). Online tools for language teaching. The Electronic Journal for English as a Second Language, 15(1). https://eprints.usq.edu.au/19373/1/Son_TESL-EJ_v15n1_PV.pdf
Thach, P. (2020). Factors influencing interaction in an online English course in Vietnam. VNU Journal of Foreign Studies, 36(3), 149-163. https://doi.org/10.25073/2525-2445/vnufs.4562
Truong, N. K.V., & Le, Q. T. (2022). Utilizing YouTube to enhance English speaking skill: EFL tertiary students’ practices and perceptions. AsiaCALL Online Journal, 13(4), 7-31. https://doi.org/10.54855/acoj.221342
Van, L. K., Dang, T. A., Pham, D. B. T., Vo, T. T. N., & Pham, V. P. H. (2021). The effectiveness of using technology in learning English. AsiaCALL Online Journal, 12(2), 24-40. https://asiacall.info/acoj/index.php/journal/article/view/26/19?fbclid=IwAR1C6KMqxnp4z_Isny1-2LLdDA1_XQBGCBB7LI25BHbinP42uM4RNutL8N8
Vo, T. K. T. (2021). Google Classroom trong dạy-học online cho sinh viên chuyên ngữ tiếng Anh tại trường Đại học Phú Yên. Tạp chí Khoa học, (27), 70-76. https://tckh.pyu.edu.vn/Resources/Docs/SubDomain/tckh/s%E1%BB%91%2027/BAI%209.pdf
Vo, T. K. T. (2021). Google Classroom in online teaching to EFL Students in Phu Yen University. Journal of Science, (27), 70-76. https://tckh.pyu.edu.vn/Resources/Docs/SubDomain/tckh/s%E1%BB%91%2027/BAI%209.pdf)
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Pham Ngoc Kim Tuyen, Huynh Ngoc Phuong Trang, Tran Vo Minh Quan, Pham Nguyen Nhat Phuong, Ho Hoang Tin, Nguyen Le Hoang Khang
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
License
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository, in a journal or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process.
Copyright
The copyright of all articles published in the acoj remains with the Authors, i.e. Authors retain full ownership of their article. Permitted third-party reuse of the open access articles is defined by the applicable Creative Commons (CC) end-user license which is accepted by the Authors upon submission of their paper. All articles in the acoj are published under the CC BY-NC 4.0 license, meaning that end users can freely share an article (i.e. copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format) and adapt it (i.e. remix, transform and build upon the material) on the condition that proper attribution is given (i.e. appropriate credit, a link to the applicable license and an indication if any changes were made; all in such a way that does not suggest that the licensor endorses the user or the use) and the material is only used for non-commercial purposes.