Utilizing Electronic Dictionaries: Voice from Vietnamese EFL Learners
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54855/acoj.231422Keywords:
Electronic dictionaries, Vietnamese EFL Learners, EDs, practices, perceptionsAbstract
Vocabulary is a crucial part of effective communication. This aspect is closely related to dictionaries, the most popular type of which is electronic dictionaries (EDs). Different studies have taken a strong interest in exploring EDs and their role in language learning, but few have been done in the Vietnamese context. This study is going to examine Vietnamese English as a Foreign Language Learners' perceptions and practices of EDs, from which suggestions are made for their effective use. The research took place at a university in Vietnam, with the participation of 12 English majors. The study used a semi-structured interview to collect qualitative data with the utilization of thematic analysis. The results found that Vietnamese EFL learners use monolingual and bilingual electronic dictionaries very often, both inside and outside the classroom. The purposes for their use are also varied, two primary ones of which are checking meaning and practicing pronunciation. Moreover, it was found that they have a positive attitude towards EDs with different beneficial elements. They also addressed a few problems using EDs and made some recommendations for better use.References
Alhaisoni, E. (2016). EFL teachers’ and students’ perceptions of dictionary use and preferences. International Journal of Linguistics, 8(6), 31-52.
Ambarwati, R., & Mandasari, B. (2020). The Influence of Online Cambridge Dictionary toward Students' Pronunciation and Vocabulary Mastery. Journal of English Language Teaching and Learning, 1(2), 50-55.
Amirian, S., & Heshmatifar, Z. (2013). The impact of using an electronic dictionary on vocabulary learning and retention of Iranian EFL learners. International Journal of Research Studies in Educational Technology, 2(1), 1-10.
Aaliyah, R. (2022). An Analysis of Students' Perception of Paper and Electronic Dictionary in Writing Skills at the Ninth Grade of SMP Negeri 1 Takalar (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from https://digilibadmin.unismuh.ac.id/upload/33881-Full_Text.pdf
Ayed, Z. S. (2020). Using Electronic Dictionary Strategy in Teaching English Vocabularies for EFL Students. Journal of Al-Frahedis Arts, 12(41 I), 563-581.
Barham, K. A. (2017, March 29-30). The use of electronic dictionary in the language classroom: The views of language learners. Paper presented at The Second International Conference for Learning and Teaching in the Digital World/Smart Learning, An-Najah National University, Nablus, Palestine. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED573437.pdf
Chaima, S. S. K., & Nouredine, M. R. (2022). EFL Learners′ Perceptions and Practices towards the Use of Dictionaries Inside and Outside the Classroom: The Case of Second Year EFL Students at Mohamed Boudiaf University of M’Sila (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from http://dspace.univ-msila.dz:8080//xmlui/handle/123456789/32465
Charpentier Jiménez, W. (2023). English as a foreign language university (EFL) students’ perception of dictionary use and training. Revista Educación, 47(1), 221-239. https://doi.org/10.15517/revedu.v47i1.51685
Chen, Y. (2010). Dictionary use and EFL learning. A contrastive study of pocket electronic dictionaries and paper dictionaries. International Journal of Lexicography, 23(3), 275-306.
Dashtestani, R. (2013). EFL teachers’ and students’ perspectives on the use of electronic dictionaries for learning English. CALL-EJ, 14(2), 51-65.
El-Sawy, H. E. A. (2019). Electronic and student-created dictionaries for enhancing EFL pronunciation and vocabulary usage. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 9(9), 1088-1099. http://dx.doi.org/10.17507/tpls.0909.04
Hakim, M. A. R., Aryati, S. N., & Kurniawan, D. (2020). Investigating E-Dictionaries on Speaking Ability among University Students in Malaysia. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 8(12), 6536-6551. http://doi.org/10.32478/evaluasi.v6i1.819
Hilary, N. E. S. I., & Warwick, U. K. (2000). Electronic dictionaries in second language vocabulary comprehension and acquisition: The state of the art. In IX EURALEX International Conference (pp. 839-847).
Hojatpanah, S., & Dashtestani, R. (2020). Electronic dictionaries as language learning tools for Iranian junior high school students. CALL-EJ Online, 21(1), 79-96.
Le, T. K.V., & Dao, T. M. T. (2019). An investigation into students’ perception of utilizing online dictionaries in translation-interpretation. Revista ESPACIOS, 40(39). Retrieved from https://www.revistaespacios.com/a19v40n39/19403902.html
Lew, R. (2012). ‘How can we make electronic dictionaries more effective?’ In S. Granger and M. Paquot (Eds), Electronic lexicography (pp. 343–361). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Loucky, J. P. (2010). Comparing electronic dictionary functions and use. CALICO Journal, 28(1), 156-174.
Metruk, R. (2017). The use of electronic dictionaries for pronunciation practice by university EFL students. Teaching English with Technology, 17(4), 38-51.
Mohamad, M., Rashid, N., & Wan, M. W. M. (2017, March). The advantages and disadvantages of E-dictionaries to enhance vocabulary learning of ESL learners. In Asian Conference on Education & International Development 2017 Official Conference Proceedings. http://papers. iafor. org/wp-content/uploads/papers/aceid2017/ACEID2017_34731. Pdf.
Nugraha, G., Ratnawati, R., & Surachmat, A. M. (2019). Exploring Low and High Students' Perception on Engaging E-Dictionary in Mastering Vocabulary: Cross-Sectional Survey. Indonesian EFL Journal, 5(1), 37-44.
Rashid, N., Yunus, M. M., & Mohamad, M. (2015, December). E-dictionary and ESL learners. In The 4th International Conference on Learner Diversity Conference, AKEPT, Bandar Enstek Nilai, Negeri Sembilan (pp. 575-581).
Ronald, J., & Ozawa, S. (2008, July). The electronic dictionary in the language classroom: The views of language learners and teachers. In Proceedings of the XIII EURALEX International Congress, Barcelona (pp. 15-19).
Tono, Y. (2000). On the Effects of Different Types of Electronic Dictionary Interfaces on L2 Learners' Reference Behaviour in Productive/Receptive Tasks. In Heid, U., S. Evert, E. Lehmann and C. Rohrer (Eds.), Proceedings of the Ninth EURALEX International Congress, EURALEX 2000, Stuttgart, Germany (pp. 855–861). Stuttgart: Institut for Maschinelle Sprachverarbeitung, Universität Stuttgart.
Töpel, A. (2014). Review of research into the use of electronic dictionaries. In C. Müller-Spitzer (Ed.), Using online dictionaries (pp. 13–15). Walter de Gruyter. http://doi. org/10.1515/9783110341287.13
Trinh, T. H., Nguyen, M. N., & Tran, T. T. H. (2022). Teachers and Students' Perceptions of Using Digital Games in Improving Vocabulary at Non-English-majored Class. AsiaCALL Online Journal, 13(5), 112-131 . https://doi.org/10.54855/acoj.221358
Trinh, T. L. A., Tran, T. K. N., Vo, T. B. N., & Huynh, T. T. S. (2021). The Difference Effects of Paper Dictionaries vs. Online Dictionaries. AsiaCALL Online Journal, 12(3), 28-38. Retrieved from https://asiacall.info/acoj/index.php/journal/article/view/34
Vakaliuk, T., Chernysh, O., Figen, K., & Ferrer-Conill, R. (2021, May). Examining the Context of E-Dictionary Use in Language Studies. In International Conference on New Trends in Languages, Literature and Social Communications (ICNTLLSC 2021) (pp. 42-52). Atlantis Press.
Wei, L. W., & Chang, C. C. (2022). Self-Investigation into Chinese EFL Learners’ Perceptions and Habits of Online English Dictionary Use. Journal of China-ASEAN Studies, 2(1), 35-46.
Zamkova, N., Tymoshchuk, N., & Havryliuk, N. (2023). Ukrainian EFL Learners’ Use and Views of Electronic Dictionaries: A Case Study in Higher Education. Arab World English Journal (AWEJ) Special Issue on Communication and Language in Virtual Spaces. 49-61. https://dx.doi.org/10.24093/awej/comm1.4
Zheng, H., & Wang, X. (2016). The use of electronic dictionaries in EFL classrooms. Studies in English language teaching, 4(1), 144-156.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Le Quang Thao
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
License
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository, in a journal or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process.
Copyright
The copyright of all articles published in the acoj remains with the Authors, i.e. Authors retain full ownership of their article. Permitted third-party reuse of the open access articles is defined by the applicable Creative Commons (CC) end-user license which is accepted by the Authors upon submission of their paper. All articles in the acoj are published under the CC BY-NC 4.0 license, meaning that end users can freely share an article (i.e. copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format) and adapt it (i.e. remix, transform and build upon the material) on the condition that proper attribution is given (i.e. appropriate credit, a link to the applicable license and an indication if any changes were made; all in such a way that does not suggest that the licensor endorses the user or the use) and the material is only used for non-commercial purposes.
