Synchronous and Asynchronous Online Communication for Developing Foreign Language Speaking Skills
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54855/acoj.241525Keywords:
computer-mediated communication, synchronous and asynchronous communication, speaking skills developmentAbstract
This study examined the effects of synchronous and asynchronous online communication using video conferences and video letters (VLs) on the development of foreign language speaking skills for Common European Framework of Reference for Languages (CEFR) A1 and B1 level learners of English. Two groups, one using the VLs and the other video conferencing (ZOOM), were constituted to compare the impact of the modes. Both groups were provided with the same topic for interaction with native English-speaking university students from the United States. Pre- and post-tests were conducted to examine the effects of each practice mode. The transcribed speaking tests were analyzed using the Complexity, Accuracy, and Fluency (CAF) framework (Housen et al., 2012). The post-test results revealed that in the ZOOM group, sentence complexity score and total number of words decreased significantly. The VL group showed no differences in word complexity and maintained sentence complexity. This study highlighted the influence of synchronous and asynchronous computer-mediated communication (CMC) approaches on speaking skills.References
Boersma, P., & Weenink, D. (2019). Praat(Version 6.1). Praat: doing phonetics by computer. https://www.fon.hum.uva.nl/praat/
Canals, L. (2020). The effects of virtual exchanges on oral skills and motivation. Language Learning, 24(3), 103–119.
De Jong, N. H., & Bosker, H. R. (2013). Choosing a threshold for silent pauses to measure second language fluency. TMH-QPSR, 54(1), 17–20.
Edwards, C. R., & Lane, P. N. (2021). Facilitating student interaction: The role of Flipgrid in blended language classrooms. Computer Assisted Language Learning Electronic Journal, 22(2), 26–39.
Foster, P., Tonkyn, A., & Wigglesworth, G. (2000). Measuring spoken language: A unit for all reasons. Applied linguistics, 21(3), 354–375. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/21.3.354
Garcia, M., & Appel, C. (2016). Synchronous tandem language learning in a MOOC context: A study on task design and learner performance (pp. 144–149). https://doi.org/10.14705/rpnet.2016.eurocall2016.552 DOI: https://doi.org/10.14705/rpnet.2016.eurocall2016.552
Guillén, G., & Blake, R. (2017). Can you repeat, please? L2 complexity, awareness, and fluency development in the hybrid “classroom”. Online language teaching research: Pedagogical, academic and institutional issues, 7(1), 55–77. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5399/osu.ubi1.d
Hatipoglu, C. (2021). Testing and assessment of speaking skills, test task types and sample test items chapter Ⅳ. Language assessment and test preparation in English as a foreign language (EFL) education, 119–140.
Housen, A., Kuiken, F., & Vedder, I. (2012). Dimensions of L2 performance and proficiency: Complexity, accuracy and fluency in SLA (Vol. 32). John Benjamins Publishing. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.32
JACET Committee of Basic Words Revision. (2016). The New JACET list of 8000 basic words: JACET 8000. Kirihara Shoten.
Jong, N. H. D., & Mora, J. C. (2019). Does having good articulatory skills lead to more fluent speech in first and second languages?. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 41(1), 227–239. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263117000389 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263117000389
Kawaguchi, S. (2016). Synchronous CMC e-tandem learning in Japanese as a second language: linguistic environment and language development. J Modern Educ Rev, 6, 439-448. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15341/jmer(2155-7993)/07.06.2016/002
Kobayashi, S. (2021). Psychological changes following L2 e-tandem learning: A case study. Electronic Journal of Foreign Language Teaching, 18(2). https://doi.org/10.56040/skpc1821 DOI: https://doi.org/10.56040/skpc1821
Lewis, T., & Qian, K. (2021). Designing and supporting virtual exchange: The case of Chinese–English e-Tandem. Modern Languages Open, 1. https://oro.open.ac.uk/81583/ DOI: https://doi.org/10.3828/mlo.v0i0.372
Long, M. H. (1996). The role of the linguistic environment in second language acquisition. Handbook of second language acquisition, 26, 413–468. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-012589042-7/50015-3
McCarthy, P. M., & Jarvis, S. (2010). MTLD, vocd-D, and HD-D: A validation study of sophisticated approaches to lexical diversity assessment. Behavior Research Methods, 42(2), 381–392. https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.42.2.381 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.42.2.381
Mizumoto, A. & Takeuchi, O. (2011). Introduction to effect size and statistical power analysis: For proper use of statistical tests. Proceedings of the 2010 Sectional Meeting of The Japan Association for Language Education and Technology, 2010, 47–73. https://www.mizumot.com/method/mizumoto-takeuchi.pdf
Norris, J. M., & Ortega, L. (2009). Towards an organic approach to investigating CAF in instructed SLA: The case of complexity. Applied Linguistics, 555–578. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amp044
Edwards, C. R., & Lane, P. N. (2021). Facilitating student interaction: The role of Flipgrid in blended language classrooms. Computer Assisted Language Learning Electronic Journal, 22(2), 26–39.
Pham, N. K. T., Huynh, T., Tran, V. M. Q., Pham, N. N. P., Ho, H. T., & Nguyen, L. H. K. (2024). EFL students’ perceptions of E-learning tools’ effects on students’ engagement in English speaking skill online classes. AsiaCALL Online Journal, 15(1). https://doi.org/10.54855/acoj.241513 DOI: https://doi.org/10.54855/acoj.241513
Qhobosheane, M. E., & Phindane, P. (2022). Speaking in a language versus speaking a language in communicative competence attainment. Proceedings of the International Conference on Education and New Developments Volume I. https://doi.org/10.36315/2022v1end125 DOI: https://doi.org/10.36315/2022v1end125
Rahimi, M., & Fathi, J. (2022). Employing e-tandem language learning method to enhance speaking skills and willingness to communicate: The case of EFL learners. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 1–37. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2022.2064512 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2022.2064512
Swain, M. (1995). Three functions of output in second language learning. Principle and practice in applied linguistics: Studies in honour of HG Widdowson, 125–144.
Swain, M. (1985). Communicative competence: Some roles of comprehensible input and comprehensible output in its vevelopment. In S. Gass, & C. Madden (Eds.), Input in Second Language Acquisition, (pp.235-253). Newbury House.
Tavakoli, P. (2016). Fluency in monologic and dialogic task performance: Challenges in defining and measuring L2 fluency. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 54(2). https://doi.org/10.1515/iral-2016-9994 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/iral-2016-9994
Tavakoli, P., Campbell, C., & McCormack, J. (2016). Development of speech fluency over a short period of time: Effects of pedagogic intervention. TESOL Quarterly, 50(2), 447–471. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.244 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.244
Tavakoli, P., Nakatsuhara, F., & Hunter, A.-M. (2017). Scoring validity of the Aptis Speaking Test: Investigating fluency across tasks and levels of proficiency. ARAGs Research Reports Online. https://centaur.reading.ac.uk/73379/
Wang, Z. (2014). On-line time pressure manipulations. Processing perspectives on task performance, 27, 62. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/tblt.5.02wan
Ware, P., & Kessler, G. (2016). Telecollaboration in the secondary language classroom: Case study of adolescent interaction and pedagogical integration. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 29(3), 427–450. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2014.961481 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2014.961481
Yang, P. L. (2022). Exploring synchronous learning during COVID-19 pandemic: Taiwan EFL college learners’ motivation and learning experience. AsiaCALL Online Journal, 13(5). https://doi.org/10.54855/acoj.221351 DOI: https://doi.org/10.54855/acoj.221351
Yanguas, Í. (2012). Task-based oral computer-mediated communication and L2 vocabulary acquisition. CALICO Journal, 29(3). DOI: https://doi.org/10.11139/cj.29.3.507-531
Yanguas, Í. (2010). Oral computer-mediated interaction between L2 learners: It’s about time!. Language Learning, 14(3), 72–93.
Zhou, A. (2023). Investigating the impact of online language exchanges on second language speaking and willingness to communicate of Chinese EFL learners: A mixed methods study. Frontiers in Psychology, 14. https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1177922 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1177922
Ziegler, N. (2016). Synchronous computer-mediated communication and interaction. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 38(3), 553–586. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S027226311500025X DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S027226311500025X
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Nami Takase
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
License
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository, in a journal or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process.
Copyright
The copyright of all articles published in the acoj remains with the Authors, i.e. Authors retain full ownership of their article. Permitted third-party reuse of the open access articles is defined by the applicable Creative Commons (CC) end-user license which is accepted by the Authors upon submission of their paper. All articles in the acoj are published under the CC BY-NC 4.0 license, meaning that end users can freely share an article (i.e. copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format) and adapt it (i.e. remix, transform and build upon the material) on the condition that proper attribution is given (i.e. appropriate credit, a link to the applicable license and an indication if any changes were made; all in such a way that does not suggest that the licensor endorses the user or the use) and the material is only used for non-commercial purposes.
