Conversation Design as a Pedagogical Strategy in ESL Classrooms: Co-creation of a Chatbot by Beginner-level Learners in India

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54855/acoj.2516112

Keywords:

Artificial Intelligence for Education, Chatbots, Conversation Design

Abstract

This study explores the use of conversation design as a pedagogical strategy in an ESL (English as a Second Language) classroom. The participants of the study are 14-year-old beginner-level learners of English who speak Hindi and reside in Hyderabad, India. Learners are tasked with collaboratively designing, creating, and testing a chatbot. Before attempting the task, learners are provided with a foundational knowledge of Artificial Intelligence (AI), conversation design principles, and the use of a no-code development platform that uses a GUI (Graphical User Interface) to design and test chatbots. The learners are allowed to make use of their own language, i.e. Hindi, to carry out discussions and design the English-speaking Chatbot. They are also required to test their Chatbot by having conversations with it. While several studies look into the use of chatbots of various kinds in language education, there is a significant gap in research related to the use of conversational user interface (CUI) design in language classrooms. The study demonstrates that integrating conversation design into a multilingual ESL classroom promotes engagement, contextual relevance, and personalized learning experiences, allowing learners to participate actively and take ownership of their language acquisition process.

Author Biography

Harshitha H, The English and Foreign Languages University, Hyderabad, India

Harshitha H is a PhD Research Scholar at the English and Foreign Languages University, Hyderabad, India. She is also working currently as a Teaching Assistant and Course Coordinator for Non-Formal Courses for English Proficiency at the University. Her research interests include Computer-Assisted Language Learning, Artificial Intelligence in Education and Digital Literacy.

References

Chen, J. A., Tutwiler, M. S., Metcalf, S. J., Kamarainen, A., Grotzer, T., & Dede, C. (2016). A multi-user virtual environment to support students' self-efficacy and interest in science: A latent growth model analysis. Learning and Instruction, 41, 11-22. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2015.09.007

Clavel Arroitia, B. (2019). Analysis of telecollaborative exchanges among secondary education students: Communication strategies and negotiation of meaning. Universidad de Granada. Porta Linguarum, 31, 97-116. DOI: https://doi.org/10.30827/portalin.vi31.13828

Golonka, E. M., Bowles, A. R., Frank, V. M., Richardson, D. L., & Freynik, S. (2014). Technologies for foreign language learning: A review of technology types and their effectiveness. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 27(1), 70-105. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2012.700315

Huang, W., Hew, K. F., & Fryer, L. K. (2022). Chatbots for language learning—Are they really useful? A systematic review of chatbot-supported language learning. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 38(1), 237–257. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12610 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12610

Lai, C., & Li, G. (2011). Technology and task-based language teaching: A critical review. CALICO journal, 28(2), 498-521. DOI: https://doi.org/10.11139/cj.28.2.498-521

Ngo, T. T. (2024). Vietnamese College Students’ Perception Towards Using TikTok for Independent English-Speaking Practice. In Proceedings of the AsiaCALL International Conference (Vol. 6, pp. 112-122). https://doi.org/10.54855/paic.2468 DOI: https://doi.org/10.54855/paic.2468

Puentedura, R.R. (2006). Transformation, technology, and education [Blog post]. Retrieved from http://hippasus.com/resources/tte/

Rasa Technologies GmbH. (2024). Rasa glossary. Rasa Docs. Retrieved from https://rasa.com/docs/rasa/glossary/

Shadiev, R., & Yang, M. (2020). Review of studies on technology-enhanced language learning and teaching. Sustainability, 12(2), 524. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12020524 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su12020524

Smith, B. (2005). The relationship between negotiated interaction, learner uptake, and lexical acquisition in task-based computer-mediated communication. TESOL Quarterly, 39(1), 33-58. https://doi.org/10.2307/3588451 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/3588451

Tran, L. A., Tran, T. D., Nguyen, M. H., & Nguyen, M. N. (2022). Language-majored students' perception of Blended learning at a university in Vietnam. In Proceedings of the AsiaCALL International Conference (Vol. 1, pp. 104-114). DOI: https://doi.org/10.54855/paic.2217

Varonis, E. & Gass, S.M. (1985). Non-native/Non-native Conversations: A Model for Negotiation of Meaning. Applied Linguistics, 6(1), 71-90. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/6.1.71

Wang, Y. F., Petrina, S., & Feng, F. (2017). VILLAGE—Virtual Immersive Language Learning and Gaming Environment: Immersion and presence. British Journal of Educational Technology, 48(2), 431-450. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12388

Zhao, Y. (2003). Recent developments in technology and language learning: A literature review and meta-analysis. CALICO journal, 21(1), 7-27. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1558/cj.v21i1.7-27

Downloads

Published

24-02-2025

How to Cite

Harshitha, H. (2025). Conversation Design as a Pedagogical Strategy in ESL Classrooms: Co-creation of a Chatbot by Beginner-level Learners in India. AsiaCALL Online Journal, 16(1), 253–263. https://doi.org/10.54855/acoj.2516112

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.