Language Teachers’ Perception and Practice of Adopting Blended Learning to Adapt to the New Normal




Blended Learning, language teachers, perceptions, practice


The practice of blending online learning and face-to-face learning has become ubiquitous across many tertiary institutions both worldwide and nationwide, especially amid the Covid-19 pandemic. This paper is based on the part of a study investigating how language teachers perceive blended learning and how they adopt this model in their teaching practice to adapt to the new normal. The participants include 50 teachers who are teaching languages such as English, French, Russian, Chinese, Japanese, and Korean at Hue University, located in central Vietnam. The data was collected through a survey and then supported by follow-up interviews with 10 of the surveyees. The findings reveal teachers' perceptions of blended learning in terms of its necessity, feasibility, usefulness, and ease of use, as well as their confidence and intention of continuation. In addition, the study also reflects the reality of how blended learning is currently applied by these language teachers regarding such factors as how the online component supports the face-to-face component, how online and face-to-face classroom activities are blended, when online and face-to-face elements are arranged, etc. There is also a comparison of these teachers’ responses based on their teaching expertise to see whether they perceive and use blended learning differently.

Author Biography

Cao Thi Xuan Lien, University of Foreign Languages and International Studies, Hue University, Vietnam

Ms. CAO Thi Xuan Lien is currently a lecturer of English at the University of Foreign Languages and International Studies, Hue University, where she is teaching four English skills and ELT methodologies for nearly 10 years. She holds a BA in English Language Teaching from the University of Foreign Languages, Hue University, and an MA in TESOL from the University of Hull, the United Kingdom. Her research interest includes CALL, CALT, and other educational technology which can help to improve her teaching and inspire her students' learning. Her recent study is about how teachers and students perceive the use of LMS in online learning, and her current study is related to blended learning.


Abdullah, F., & Ward, R. (2016). Developing a General Extended Technology Acceptance Model for ELearning (GETAMEL) by analysing commonly used external factors. Computers in Human Behavior, 56, 238 - 256.

Alammary A (2019) Blended learning models for introductory programming courses: A systematic review. PLoS ONE, 14(9): e0221765.

Alammary, A., Sheard, J., & Carbone, A. (2014). Blended learning in higher education: Three different design approaches. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 30(4), 440-454.

Anthony, B., Kamaludin, A., Romli, A., Raffei, A. F. M., Phon, D. N. A., Abdullah, A., & Ming, G. L. (2020). Blended learning adoption and implementation in higher education: A theoretical and systematic review. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 1-48.

Bleed, R. (2001). A hybrid campus for the new millennium. Educause Review, 36(1), 16-22.

Bliuc, A. M., Goodyear, P., & Ellis, R. A. (2007). Research focus and methodological choices in studies into students' experiences of blended learning in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 10(4), 231-244.

Bordoloi, R., Das, P. and Das, K. (2021). Perception towards online/blended learning at the time of Covid-19 pandemic: An academic analytics in the Indian context. Asian Association of Open Universities Journal, 16 (1), 41-60.

Cao, T.X.L. (2017). Applying flipped classroom in teaching writing skills to EFL students. Journal of Inquiry into Languages and Cultures, 1(3), 36-48.

Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340.

Dennis, N. K. (2013). Integration of a blended e-learning application for teaching English at a local university in Thailand. AsiaCALL Online Journal, 7(1).

Dörnyei, Z. (2007). Research Methods in Applied Linguistics. Oxford University Press.

Driscoll, M. (2002). Blended learning: Let’s get beyond the hype. E-learning, 1(4), 1-4.

Gilakjani, A. P., & Branch, L. (2012). EFL teachers’ beliefs toward using computer technology in English language teaching. Journal of Studies in Education, 2(2), 62-80.

Hoang, T.T.H. (2015). Applying ‘flipped classroom’ in teaching and learning French: Advantages and disadvantages. Proceedings of the 2nd National Interdisciplinary Conference about Language and Language Education. University of Foreign Languages, Hue University.

Hockly, N. (2018). Blended learning. ELT Journal, 72 (1), 97-101.

Hofmann, J. (2018). Blended learning. American Society for Training and Development.

Hubackova, S., Semradova, I., & Klimova, B. F. (2011). Blended learning in a foreign language teaching. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 28, 281-285.

Hrastinski, S. (2019). What do we mean by blended learning?. TechTrends, 63(5), 564-569.

Ismayana, D., Mulyono, H., Suryoputro, G., & Komara, C. (2020). An evaluation of EFL teachers’ perceptions of blended learning, Proceedings of the Third Workshop on Multidisciplinary and Its Applications, 1-6.

Kanniah, A. (2014). Teachers’ acceptance level in using technology in the classroom. AsiaCALL Online Journal, 9(1), 27-43.

Kaur, M. (2013). Blended learning-its challenges and future, Procedia-social and behavioral sciences, 93, 612-617.

Nguyen, T. K., & Nguyen, T. H. T. (2021). The acceptance and use of video conferencing for teaching in Covid-19 Pandemic: An empirical study in Vietnam. AsiaCALL Online Journal, 12(5), 1-16.

Phan, T.T.T. (2018). Teaching translation modules using Moodle: A quantitative research at University of Foreign Languages, Hue University. Journal of Inquiry into Languages and Cultures, 2(2), 196-207.

Picciano, A. (2009). Blending with purpose: The multimodal model. Journal of the Research Center for Educational Technology, 5(1), 4-14.

Rahman, S. F. A., Yunus, M., & Hashim, H. (2019). A Technology Acceptance Model (TAM): Malaysian ESL lecturers' attitude in adapting flipped learning. Malaysian Journal of Education (0126-6020), 44.

Rai, N., & Thapa, B. (2015). A study on purposive sampling method in research. Kathmandu:Kathmandu School of Law, 1–12.

Rivera, J. (2019) Blended learning - Effectiveness and application in teaching and learning Foreign languages. Open Journal of Modern Linguistics, 9, 129-144. doi:

Saeed, N. (2020). Teachers’ perceptions on the use of the blended learning. [Doctoral dissertation, Houston Baptist University].

Sánchez-Gómez, M. C., Martín-García, A. V., & Mena, J. (2020). Blended learning in tertiary education: teachers' beliefs according to the technology acceptance model. International Journal of Learning Technology, 15(4), 341-359.

Teo, T., Huang, F., & Hoi, C. K. W. (2018). Explicating the influences that explain intention to use technology among English teachers in China. Interactive Learning Environments,26(4), 460–475.

Tran, T. P., & Nguyen, T. T. A. (2022). Online education at Saigon University during the COVID-19 pandemic: A survey on non-English major college students’ attitudes towards learning English . AsiaCALL Online Journal, 13(2), 1-20.

Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS quarterly, 425-478.




How to Cite

Cao, T. X. L. (2022). Language Teachers’ Perception and Practice of Adopting Blended Learning to Adapt to the New Normal. AsiaCALL Online Journal, 13(5), 29–45.



Research Article

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.