A Systematic Review of How ChatGPT is Perceived and Utilized in EFL Writing Classes: Implications for Vietnam
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54855/acoj.2516115Keywords:
ChatGPT, AI, systematic review, perception, integration, digital pedagogyAbstract
Since its debut, ChatGPT has emerged in heated discussions among language teachers and educators. This paper presents a systematic literature review of teachers’ perceptions on integrating ChatGPT, which is an OpenAI-developed large-scale generative language model used in English as a Foreign Language (EFL) writing classes in higher education. The study aims to provide a comprehensive overview of current research on how ChatGPT is perceived and utilized in writing classes. For the systematic review, a total of 118 research articles published from November 2022 to April 2024 were collected based on specific keywords. After applying inclusion and exclusion criteria, 29 publications were selected for review. Findings indicate diverse perspectives among higher education teachers regarding ChatGPT's utility. Additionally, its integration in higher education EFL writing classes is still in its early stages, with the current emphasis on content revision, proofreading, prompt creation, idea generation, and providing personalized feedback. These results underscore the need for ongoing research, urging Vietnamese teachers to carefully consider ChatGPT's integration. There is a pressing demand for training both teachers and students in higher education in the Vietnamese EFL context to address the issues of academic integrity, critical thinking, and the challenges associated with home-based assessments.References
Al-Obaydi, L.H., Pikhart, M., Klimova, B. (2023). ChatGPT and the General Concepts of Education: Can Artificial Intelligence-Driven Chatbots Support the Process of Language Learning? International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET), 18(21), pp. 39–50.https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v18i21.42593 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v18i21.42593
Alafnan, M. A., Dishari, S., Jovic, M., & Lomidze, K. (2023). ChatGPT as an Educational Tool: Opportunities, Challenges, and Recommendations for Communication, Business Writing, and Composition Courses. Journal of Artificial Intelligence and Technology, 3(2), 60–68. https://doi.org/10.37965/jait.2023.0184 DOI: https://doi.org/10.37965/jait.2023.0184
Algaraady, J., & Mahyoob, M. (2023). ChatGPT’s Capabilities in Spotting and Analyzing Writing Errors Experienced by EFL Learners. Arab World English Journal, 9, 3–17. https://doi.org/10.24093/awej/call9.1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.24093/awej/call9.1
Alzubi, A. A. F. (2024). Generative Artificial Intelligence in the EFL Writing Context: Students’ Literacy in Perspective. Qubahan Academic Journal , 4(2), 59–69. https://doi.org/10.48161/qaj.v4n2a506 DOI: https://doi.org/10.48161/qaj.v4n2a506
Anders, B., & Sahakyan, S. (2023). ChatGPT and AI presentation and Q&A
[Powerpoint slides]. American University of Armenia Center for Teaching
and Learning. https://ctl.aua.am/view/uploads/entry/26/
Athanassopoulos, S., Manoli, P., Gouvi, M., Lavidas, K., & Komis, V. (2023). The use of ChatGPT as a learning tool to improve foreign language writing in a multilingual and multicultural classroom. Advances in Mobile Learning Educational Research, 3(2), 818-824. https://doi.org/10.25082/AMLER.2023.02.009 DOI: https://doi.org/10.25082/AMLER.2023.02.009
Baskara, R., Mukarto, M. (2023). Exploring the Implications of ChatGPT for Language Learning in Higher Education. Indonesian Journal of English Language Teaching and Applied Linguistics, 7(2), 343- 358 DOI: https://doi.org/10.21093/ijeltal.v7i2.1387
Cheng, W., & Warren, M. (1997). Having second thoughts: Student perceptions before and after a peer assessment exercise. Studies in Higher Education, 22(2), 233239. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079712331381064 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079712331381064
David, J., & Liss, R. (2006). Effective academic writing 3 (1st ed.). USA: Oxford University Press.
Dr. Shweta Batra, Dr. Sunita Verma. (2023). To Study the Impact of Chatgpt Tool on Academic Learning: Perspective of Students and Teachers in Higher Education. Journal of Informatics Education and Research, 3(2). https://doi.org/10.52783/jier.v3i2.340 DOI: https://doi.org/10.52783/jier.v3i2.340
Euronews. (2024, October 14). The boom of artificial intelligence (AI) chatbots prompted one teacher to start incorporating it into the classroom, rather than blocking it. Euronews. https://www.euronews.com/embed/2389662
Farr, S. (2010). Teaching as leadership: The Highly Effective Teacher's Guide to Close the Achievement Gap. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publication.
Gao, Y., Wang, Q., & Wang, X. (2024). Exploring EFL university teachers’ beliefs in integrating ChatGPT and other large language models in language education: a study in China. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 44(1), 29–44. https://doi.org/10.1080/02188791.2024.2305173 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02188791.2024.2305173
Hawanti, S., & Zubaydulloevna, K. M. (2023). AI chatbot-based learning: alleviating students’ anxiety in english writing classroom. Bulletin of Social Informatics Theory and Application, 7(2), 182–192. https://doi.org/10.31763/businta.v7i2.659 DOI: https://doi.org/10.31763/businta.v7i2.659
Hoang, V. V. (2010). The current situation and issues of the teaching of English in Vietnam. Ritsumeikan Studies in Language and Culture, 22(1), 7-18.
Hoang, V. V. (2015). "The Process Approach in Teaching Writing: An Innovation in Vietnam’s Higher Education." VNU Journal of Foreign Studies, 31(3), 55-65.
Hong, W. C. H. (2023). The impact of ChatGPT on foreign language teaching and learning: Opportunities in education and research. Journal of Educational Technology and Innovation. 年第一期 37-45 DOI: https://doi.org/10.61414/jeti.v5i1.103
Huang, J. (2023). Engineering ChatGPT Prompts for EFL Writing Classes. In International Journal of TESOL Studies 5 (4) pp. 73–79. https://doi.org/10.58304/ijts.20230405 DOI: https://doi.org/10.58304/ijts.20230405
Imran, M. & Almusharraf, N. (2023). Analyzing the role of ChatGPT as a writing assistant at higher education level: A systematic review of the literature. Contemporary Educational Technology, 2023, 15(4), ep464. DOI: https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/13605
Jackaria, P. M., Hajan, B. H., & Mastul, A. R. H. (2024). A Comparative Analysis of the Rating of College Students’ Essays by ChatGPT versus Human Raters. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 23(2), 478–492. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.23.2.23 DOI: https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.23.2.23
Klimova, B., Pikhart, M., & Al-Obaydi, L. H. (2024). Exploring the potential of ChatGPT for foreign language education at the university level. Frontiers in Psychology, 15. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1269319
Klimova B, Pikhart M and Al-Obaydi LH (2024) Exploring the potential of ChatGPT for foreign language education at the university level. Front. Psychol. 15:1269319. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1269319 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1269319
Koraishi, O. (2023). Teaching English in the Age of AI: Embracing ChatGPT to Optimize EFL Materials and Assessment. Language Education & Technology (LET Journal), 3(1), 55-72.
Kostka, I., & Toncelli, R. (2023). Exploring Applications of ChatGPT to English Language Teaching: Opportunities, Challenges, and Recommendations. TESL-EJ, 27(3). PP. 1-19 https://doi.org/10.55593/ej.27107int DOI: https://doi.org/10.55593/ej.27107int
Kumar, A.H. (2023). Analysis of ChatGPT Tool to Assess the Potential of its Utility for Academic Writing in Biomedical Domainpp. BEMS Reports, 2023; 9(1):24-30. https://www.bemsreports.org DOI: https://doi.org/10.5530/bems.9.1.5
Lancaster, T., (2023). Artificial intelligence, text generation tools and ChatGPT – does digital watermarking offer a solution? International Journal for Educational Integrity 19:10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40979-023-00131-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40979-023-00131-6
Le, H. T. & Le, M. N. (2016). "Using Technology in Teaching Writing to Vietnamese Learners." VNU Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 32(4), 11-19.
Le, T. N. & Nguyen, N. T. T. (2020). ietnamese EFL Students’ Attitudes Towards Collaborative Writing Activities. International Journal of English Linguistics, 10(5), 124-134.
Le, T.T., Hua, H.H., & Pham, T.T.(2023). Exploring the impacts of ChatGPT in EFL writing: Student perceptions of opportunities and challenges in Vietnamese higher education. Jurnal Ilmu Keguruan, 1. Pp. 107-124 https://afeksi.id/journal3/index.php/kognisi/index DOI: https://doi.org/10.59698/kognisi.v1i2.175
Le, V. C., & Barnard, R. (2009). Teaching and learning EFL in the Vietnamese context: A sociocultural perspective. TESL-EJ, 13(2), 1-20.
Lee, Y., & Cho, H.-S. (2024). l. Educational Research Institute, 43(3), 877–894. https://doi.org/10.34245/jed.43.3.877 DOI: https://doi.org/10.34245/jed.43.3.877
Loos, E., Radicke, J. Using ChatGPT-3 as a writing tool: an educational assistant or a moral hazard? Current ChatGPT-3 media representations compared to Plato’s critical stance on writing in Phaedrus. AI Ethics (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s43681-024-00470-1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s43681-024-00470-1
Mabuan, R.A. (2024). ChatGPT and ELT: Exploring teachers’ voices. International Journal of Technology in Education (IJTE), 7(1), 128-153. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijte.523 DOI: https://doi.org/10.46328/ijte.523
Mahapatra, S. Impact of ChatGPT on ESL students’ academic writing skills: a mixed methods intervention study. Smart Learn. Environ. 11, 9 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-024-00295-9 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-024-00295-9
Marzuki, Widiati, U., Rusdin, D., Darwin, , & Indrawati, I. (2023). The impact of AI writing tools on the content and organization of students’ writing: EFL teachers’ perspective. Cogent Education, 10(2). pp 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2023.2236469 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2023.2236469
Nguyen, T. M. H. (2011). Primary English language education policy in Vietnam: Insights from implementation. Current Issues in Language Planning, 12(2), 225-249. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14664208.2011.597048
Nguyen, T. T. M. (2011). "A Study of Vietnamese EFL Learners’ Writing Errors." Asian EFL Journal, 13(4), 112-129.
Nguyen, T. Y. P., Nguyen, N. T., & Phan, N. K. H. (2025). The Challenges of Applying ChatGPT in the Academic Writing of Postgraduate Students in English Major at IUH. International Journal of AI in Language Education, 2(1), 20-37. DOI: https://doi.org/10.54855/ijaile.25212 DOI: https://doi.org/10.54855/ijaile.25212
Ningrum, S. (2023). ChatGPT’s Impact: The AI Revolution in EFL Writing Full Paper. In Borneo Engineering & Advanced Multidisciplinary International Journal (BEAM (Vol. 2). https://beam.pmu.edu.my
Parker, J.L., Becker, K., & Carroca, C. (2023). ChatGPT for Automated Writing Evaluation in Scholarly Writing Instruction. Journal of Nursing Education. 62(12):721–727. https:// doi: 10.3928/01484834-20231006-02. Epub 2023 Dec 1. PMID: 38049299. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3928/01484834-20231006-02
Pham, H. (2011). Issues in teaching writing in EFL classrooms: Views from Vietnamese tertiary teachers and students. Journal of English Language Teaching and Research, 2(2), 123-139.
Pham, N. N. H. (2025). The Use of ChatGPT in EFL students as a Learning Assistant in their
Writing Skills: A literature review. International Journal of AI in Language Education, 2(1), 38-54. DOI: https://doi.org/10.54855/ijaile.25213 DOI: https://doi.org/10.54855/ijaile.25213
Pham, V. P. H., Luong, T. K. P., Tran, T. T. O., & Nguyen, Q. G. (2020). Should Peer E-Comments Replace Traditional Peer Comments? International Journal of Instruction, 13(1), 295314. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2020.13120a DOI: https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2020.13120a
Pham, H. H. (2007). Communicative language teaching: Unity within diversity. ELT Journal, 61(3), 193-201. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccm026
Santoso, A. (2010). Scaffolding an EFL effective writing class in a hybrid learning community. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation. Queensland: Queensland University of Technology.
Sawangwan, S. (2024). ChatGPT VS Teacher’s Roles in Developing English Writing of Thai EFL Learners. Research Square (Research Square). https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-4629708/v1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-4629708/v1
Song, C., & Song, Y. (2023). Enhancing academic writing skills and motivation: assessing the efficacy of ChatGPT in AI-assisted language learning for EFL students. Frontiers in Psychology, 14. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1260843 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1260843
Strobl, C., Menke-Bazhutkinab, I. & Abel, N. (2024). Adopting ChatGPT as a Writing Buddy in the Advanced L2 Writing Class. Technology in Language Teaching & Learning, 6(1), pp.1–19. https://doi.org/10.29140/tltl.v6n1.1168 pp.1-19 DOI: https://doi.org/10.29140/tltl.v6n1.1168
Su, Y., Lin, Y., & Lai, C. (2023). Collaborating with ChatGPT in argumentative writing classrooms. Assessing Writing, 57, 1-11 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2023.100752 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2023.100752
Tarchi, C., Zappoli, A., Casado Ledesma, L., & Brante, E. W. (2024). The Use of ChatGPT in Source-Based Writing Tasks. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-024-00413-1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-024-00413-1
Tran, T. Q. & Duong, T. M. (2018). eaching Academic Writing to English-Major Students at a Vietnamese University: A Genre-Based Approach. English Language Teaching, 11(6), 107-116.
Tran, T.T.H. (2024). AI Tools in Teaching and Learning English Academic Writing Skills. Proceedings of AsiaCALL International Conference, 4, 170-187. ISSN: 2833-6836; ISBN: 979-8-9870112-4-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.54855/paic.23413 DOI: https://doi.org/10.54855/paic.23413
Zhao, X., Cox, A., & Cai, L. (2024). ChatGPT and the digitisation of writing. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 11(1). pp1-9 https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-024-02904-x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-024-02904-x
Zhang, Z. (2024). ChatGPT: Enhancing Learner Agency and Multilingual Practices in English Writing Class. Journal of Education, Humanities and Social Sciences, 26, 1153–1160. https://doi.org/10.54097/2cwdzn44 DOI: https://doi.org/10.54097/2cwdzn44
Zohery, M. (2023). ChatGPT in Academic Writing and Publishing: A Comprehensive Guide. In Artificial Intelligence in Academia, Research and Science: ChatGPT as a Case Study. (First Edition) (pp. 10–61). Novabret Publishing. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7803703
Wang, C. Exploring Students’ Generative AI-Assisted Writing Processes: Perceptions and Experiences from Native and Nonnative English Speakers. Tech Know Learn (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-024-09744-3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-024-09744-3
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Le Thi Thien Phuoc, Quach Thi To Nu, Pham Thi Xuan Trinh, Nguyen Dinh Luat
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
License
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository, in a journal or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process.
Copyright
The copyright of all articles published in the acoj remains with the Authors, i.e. Authors retain full ownership of their article. Permitted third-party reuse of the open access articles is defined by the applicable Creative Commons (CC) end-user license which is accepted by the Authors upon submission of their paper. All articles in the acoj are published under the CC BY-NC 4.0 license, meaning that end users can freely share an article (i.e. copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format) and adapt it (i.e. remix, transform and build upon the material) on the condition that proper attribution is given (i.e. appropriate credit, a link to the applicable license and an indication if any changes were made; all in such a way that does not suggest that the licensor endorses the user or the use) and the material is only used for non-commercial purposes.
