AI-Powered Writing Tools: A Phenomenological Inquiry of Tertiary Students’ Usage
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54855/acoj.241523Keywords:
AI-Powered writing tools, artificial intelligence, tertiary standards, writing practices.Abstract
AI-powered writing tools have become indispensable companions for enhancing writing. This study aimed to comprehensively explore the lived experiences and contexts of the students' use of AI tools and their effects on their writing abilities and learning experiences. The study employed the transcendental phenomenological research design with six participants. Using Irving Seidman's guide, a purposeful sampling technique was utilized to select the participants before conducting the phenological Interview. Creswell's adapted Stevick-Colaizzi-Keen method was used to generate emerging themes of this study. Based on the findings drawn, results underscored the transformative impact of these tools, such as students' writing challenges without AI tools, emphasizing their grammatical issues, limited ideation, and academic writing intricacies, providing immediate support, and overcoming hurdles. Also, it highlighted students' reliance on AI while emphasizing the need for control to avoid dependency and encourage teacher feedback. The study concluded with recommendations for integrating AI writing tools in education, promoting balanced dependence, and fostering continuous improvement in these tools to meet diverse learning needs.References
Alharbi, W. H. (2022). The affordances of augmented reality technology in the English for specific purposes classroom: its impact on vocabulary learning and students motivation in a Saudi higher education institution. Journal of Positive School Psychology, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 6588–6602, 2022. https://www.journalppw.com/index.php/jpsp/article/download/3849/2521/4400
Ariyanti, A. (2016). Shaping Students’ Writing Skills: The Study of Fundamental Aspects in Mastering Academic Writing. https://doi.org/10.21462/IJEFLL.V1I1.5 DOI: https://doi.org/10.21462/ijefll.v1i1.5
Bridgeman, B., & Ramineni, C. (2017). Design and evaluation of automated writing evaluation models: Relationships with writing in naturalistic settings. Assessing Writing, 34, 62–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2017.10.001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2017.10.001
Creswell, J. W. (2013). Qualitative Inquiry & Research Design: Choosing among Five Approaches (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE. https://revistapsicologia.org/public/formato/cuali2.pdf
Dale, R., & Viethen, J. (2021). The automated writing assistance landscape in 2021. Natural Language Engineering 27, 511–518. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1351324921000164 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1351324921000164
Downes, S. (2005). Connective knowledge. https://www.downes.ca/post/33034 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/1104966.1104968
Dron, J., & Anderson, T. (2014). Teaching crowds: Learning and social media. Athabasca University Press. https://doi.org/10.15215/aupress/9781927356807.01 DOI: https://doi.org/10.15215/aupress/9781927356807.01
Eaton, S. E., Mindzak, M., & Morrison, R. (2021, May 29–June 3). Artificial intelligence, algorithmic writing & educational ethics [Paper presentation]. Canadian Society for the Study of Education [Société canadienne pour l’étude de l’éducation] (CSSE) 2021, Edmonton, AB, Canada. http://hdl.handle.net/1880/113569
Fan, N., & Ma, Y. (2022). The effects of Automated Writing Evaluation (AWE) feedback on students' English writing quality: A systematic literature review'. Language Teaching Research Quarterly, 28, pp. 53–73. https://doi.org/10.32038/ltrq.2022.28.03 DOI: https://doi.org/10.32038/ltrq.2022.28.03
Fitria, T. (2021). Grammarly as AI-powered English writing assistant: Students' alternative for writing English. Metathesis: Journal of English Language, Literature, and Teaching, 5(1), 65-78. http://dx.doi.org/10.31002/metathesis.v5i1.3519 DOI: https://doi.org/10.31002/metathesis.v5i1.3519
Frankenberg-Garcia, A. (2018). Combining user needs, lexicographic data and digital writing environments. Language Teaching, 53(1), 29–43. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0261444818000277 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444818000277
Giles, H. (2016). Communication Accommodation Theory of Howard Giles (pp. 423-427). CORE https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/147103741.pdf
Han, Y., Zhao, S., & Ng, L.L. (2021). How Technology Tools Impact Writing Performance, Lexical Complexity, and Perceived Self-Regulated Learning Strategies in EFL Academic Writing: A Comparative Study. Frontiers in Psychology, 12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.752793 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.752793
Kessler, M. (2020). Technology-Mediated Writing: Exploring Incoming Graduate Students’ L2 Writing Strategies with Activity Theory. Computers and Composition. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compcom.2020.102542 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compcom.2020.102542
Koltovskaia, S. (2020). Student engagement with automated written corrective feedback (AWCF) provided by Grammarly: A multiple case study. Assessing Writing, 44, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2020.100450 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2020.100450
Liu, D., Gong, C., Zhang, S., & Ma, Y. (2022). The influence of firm’s feedback on user-generated content’s linguistic style matching–an explanation based on communication accommodation theory. Frontiers in Psychology, 13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.949968 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.949968
Marzuki, Utami Widiati, Diyenti Rusdin, Darwin & Inda Indrawati (2023) The impact of AI writing tools on the content and organization of students’ writing: EFL teachers’ perspective, Cogent Education, 10:2, 2236469, https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2023.2236469 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2023.2236469
Moustakas, C. (1994) Phenomenological research methods. Thousand Oaks: Sage. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412995658 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412995658
Nguyen, Q. H. (2023). AI and Plagiarism: Opinion from Teachers, Administrators and Policymakers. Proceedings of the AsiaCALL International Conference, 4, 75–85. https://doi.org/10.54855/paic.2346 DOI: https://doi.org/10.54855/paic.2346
Pellet, S., & Myers, L. (2022). What’s wrong with “What is your name?” > “Quel est votre nom?”: Teaching responsible use of MT through discursive competence and metalanguage awareness. L2 Journal, 14(1), 166–194. https://doi.org/10.5070/l214151739 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5070/L214151739
Phan, T. N. L. (2023). Students’ Perceptions of the AI Technology Application in English Writing Classes. Proceedings of the AsiaCALL International Conference, 4, 45–62. https://doi.org/10.54855/paic.2344 DOI: https://doi.org/10.54855/paic.2344
Rahimian, M. (2014). Communication accommodation theory in conversation with Second language learners. Library and Archives Canada = Bibliothèque et Archives Canada.
Ranalli, J., & Yamashita, T. (2022). Automated written corrective feedback: Error-correction performance and timing of delivery. Language Learning & Technology, 26(1), 1–25. http://hdl.handle.net/10125/73465
Rogerson, A. M., & McCarthy, G. (2017, January 26). Using internet based paraphrasing tools: Original work, patchwriting or facilitated plagiarism? - International Journal for Educational Integrity. BioMed Central. https://edintegrity.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1007/s40979-016-0013-y DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40979-016-0013-y
Saeed, M.A., & Al Qunayeer, H.S. (2020). Exploring teacher interactive e-feedback on students’ writing through Google Docs: factors promoting interactivity and potential for learning. The Language Learning Journal, 50, 360 - 377. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09571736.2020.1786711
Seidman, I. (1991). Interviewing as Qualitative Research: A guide for researchers in education and the Social Sciences.
Siemens, G. (2005). Connectivism: A theory for the digital age. International Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance Learning, 2 (1). 1-9.
Song, C., & Song, Y. (2023). Enhancing academic writing skills and motivation: assessing the efficacy of ChatGPT in AI-assisted language learning for EFL students. Frontiers in Psychology, 14. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1260843 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1260843
Tran, T. N., & Tran, H. P. (2023). Exploring the Role of ChatGPT in Developing Critical Digital Literacies in Language Learning: A Qualitative Study. Proceedings of the AsiaCALL International Conference, 4, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.54855/paic.2341 DOI: https://doi.org/10.54855/paic.2341
Wang, Pei-ling. (2013). Can Automated Writing Evaluation Programs Help Students Improve Their English Writing? International Journal of Applied Linguistics & English Literature. 2. 6-12. 10.7575/ijalel.v.2n.1p.6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7575/ijalel.v.2n.1p.6
Yuan, Y., Li, H., & Sawaengdist, A. (2024). The impact of ChatGPT on learners in English academic writing: opportunities and challenges in education. Language Learning in Higher Education, 14, 41 - 56. https://doi.org/10.1515/cercles-2023-0006 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/cercles-2023-0006
Zhang, Victor & Zhang, Yue. (2018). Automated Writing Evaluation System: Tapping its Potential for Learner Engagement. IEEE Engineering Management Review. 46. 29-33. 10.1109/EMR.2018.2866150. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/EMR.2018.2866150
Zhou, Y., & Wei, M. (2018). Strategies in technology-enhanced language learning. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching. https://doi.org/10.14746/SSLLT.2018.8.2.13 DOI: https://doi.org/10.14746/ssllt.2018.8.2.13
Zimmerman, B. J., & Labuhn, A. S. (2012). Self-regulation of learning: Process approaches to personal development. https://doi.org/10.1037/13273-014 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/13273-014
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Kurt Candilas, Myzzie Chyle N. Japson, Vinz Danielle Bartolata, Danielle Joy R. Amores, Samantha Ritz Abas, Princess Anghela M. Getuaban
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
License
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository, in a journal or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process.
Copyright
The copyright of all articles published in the acoj remains with the Authors, i.e. Authors retain full ownership of their article. Permitted third-party reuse of the open access articles is defined by the applicable Creative Commons (CC) end-user license which is accepted by the Authors upon submission of their paper. All articles in the acoj are published under the CC BY-NC 4.0 license, meaning that end users can freely share an article (i.e. copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format) and adapt it (i.e. remix, transform and build upon the material) on the condition that proper attribution is given (i.e. appropriate credit, a link to the applicable license and an indication if any changes were made; all in such a way that does not suggest that the licensor endorses the user or the use) and the material is only used for non-commercial purposes.